Monitor the claim in context
Check partner pages for unapproved guarantees, unsupported comparisons, omitted qualifications and wording that differs from your approved claims.
Compare external marketing with your approved claims, qualifications and campaign terms. Give pharma and healthcare reviewers a page-specific potential issue to assess, with the context attached.
Talk about marketing compliance ↗“Guaranteed treatment approval, without the wait.”
“Treatment is subject to clinical assessment.”
Check partner pages for unapproved guarantees, unsupported comparisons, omitted qualifications and wording that differs from your approved claims.
Find outdated prices, expired promotions, missing eligibility conditions and links to the wrong landing page. Compare published details with the current information you provide.
Give reviewers the captured content, location, check time and matched policy. Assign corrections, record decisions and verify the requested changes.
Turn departures from approved messaging into reviewable exceptions.
The pages in scope, approved claims and qualifications, current offers, the relevant reference versions, and your market-specific review rules.
A finding with the source, observed wording, check time/context, reference or rule to review, and relevant capture. Review and recheck history is retained within the agreed workflow.
Your designated reviewer confirms whether action is needed. Your partner manager requests the correction; a recheck records whether the requested wording changed.
Compare published wording with the approved reference supplied by your team.
The wording that needs review and the reference used.
Check configured eligibility, limitation, disclosure or offer requirements.
A potential omission with the surrounding content, not an automatic legal verdict.
Compare visible offers and descriptions with the current campaign information you supply.
Affected URL and the outdated statement or term.
Revisit the relevant page after an update is requested.
A new observation and the status of that specific correction, not certification of the entire page.
Evaluate review turnaround, open correction age, repeat issues and unresolved coverage gaps. Agree definitions first; no improvement figure is promised.
“Guaranteed treatment approval.”
Do not promise treatment approval before the required clinical assessment. A reviewer decides whether a correction is required.
No. Treato identifies potential issues against agreed policies and checks. Legal interpretation, clinical judgement and final decisions remain with your team.
Yes. Scope checks around the services, audiences and markets you select. Your approved policies and local review requirements determine what is monitored and how findings are handled.
Identify the actual classification. Do not apply one promotional rule set to every medicine or health product.
Define the intended audience and observable access context. An open page and authorised professional content need different review scopes.
Agree the relevant market policy with your reviewers. A US campaign and UK public-facing promotion must not be treated as interchangeable.
Separate commissioned promotion, contracted partner activity and independent editorial mentions. An observed link does not establish commercial responsibility.
Your team approves the reference material and makes the final judgement. If content raises a safety concern or product complaint, follow your established safety process; do not rely on marketing monitoring as the intake or reporting system.
Pick the question, the sources and the measures your team will use to judge the result.
Tell us about your partner network. We’ll help you scope the right monitoring coverage.
Talk to Treato A conversation about your partners, markets and priorities.